Australian national broadcaster ABC has projected three states voted No, effectively defeating the referendum.

  • MJBrune@beehaw.org
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    0
    ·
    9 months ago

    Man, I didn’t know Australia was full of idiots. There was absolutely no reason to vote no to this. It was simply a group that would give feedback to the Australian Senate. Feedback from a marginalized group of the land you stole. Feedback that could simply be ignored by the Senate. It was simply giving that group a voice. How you could vote against that, I have no clue.

      • comfy@lemmy.ml
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        1
        ·
        edit-2
        9 months ago

        No, it is not just racism. There would have been an element of that, but it’s certainly far from the main reason. That idea is contradicted by the facts that a very significant portion of Indigenous people and Indigenous activists voted against it.

        Linking to this useful post, explaining why various progressive groups were against it.

      • MxM111@kbin.social
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        0
        ·
        9 months ago

        In my opinion a racism is having different laws for people with different genetics/skin color. “Black is not allowed” is racism. The proposed law is actually the one doing exactly the same - it treats people differently according to their genetics. Why people think it is good - is beyond me.

        • Omega_Haxors@lemmy.ml
          link
          fedilink
          arrow-up
          0
          arrow-down
          1
          ·
          9 months ago

          This is veering dangerously close to the arguments neo-nazis make against affirmative action.

    • JustSomePerson@kbin.social
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      0
      ·
      9 months ago

      There was absolutely no reason to vote no to this.

      Of course there was. Enshrining different rights to different people in the constitution based on their race, is fundamentally objectionable.

        • JustSomePerson@kbin.social
          link
          fedilink
          arrow-up
          0
          ·
          9 months ago

          Everybody should have the same right to be heard. Different people having different rights to be heard, based on their race, is absolutely objectionable. And racist.

          • Anchorite@lemm.ee
            link
            fedilink
            arrow-up
            0
            ·
            9 months ago

            You’re looking at a set of unequal scales and saying they should be equal, while refusing to place more weight onto either side…

            • JustSomePerson@kbin.social
              link
              fedilink
              arrow-up
              1
              ·
              edit-2
              9 months ago

              Enshrining racial differences in the constitution is absolutely disgusting, no matter how good your intentions are.