He is literally just some guy with no expertise in critical media analysis. He just made a website where he gives his opinions on how much you should trust a source.

Hey, just as a heads up we discourage the posting of " media bias checkers" here because it is intellectually sloppy to outsource whether you should trust a source to some guy who has their own bias.

Please reply acknowledging you understand this within 48 hours.

I dont see it garnering outrage? It seems in line with what Kamala Harris said.

Why is it inflammatory? As a mod I’m genuinely surprised people are upset by this, it is a white house press statement with an editorialized title that summarizes the event quickly and without any commentary on it.

Hey, please don’t use mediabiasfactcheck, the guy is just a center right tool without any qualifications to be making statements about the accuracy of reporting.

Also, please remember that fact checkers aren’t really useful for determining the accuracy of a piece and you should practice “critical reading” skills instead of relying on random people who make websites to tell you how truthful something is.

Please respond to this message and confirm you will follow the instructions within 48 hours!

Thanks!

Please don’t spread the Uyghur genocide narrative here. Adrian Zenz is not a reliable source and connected to the US state.

It is more like saying the axis is known to invade nations because its member states invade nations. Okay, sure, Germany and Italy invaded the soviet union but Japan didn’t, you can’t say they’re not a defensive alliance /s

Unironically yes, NATO members have invaded a lot of places, often in coalition with other member states.

You’re going to need to show that you have a serious understanding here or you’re going to need to stop posting on the topic in this comm.

Neither is credible: they also claim that the weapons were made in Russia, not that they were given by Russia. Remember the whole “soviet union” thing, where a lot of Eastern European countries still have leftover arms and ammunition from?

I asked for a credible source for multiple assaults and you gave me one story from the NYT.

Theyre literally citing the new York times, I asked for credible sources regarding the SA claim.

I do when there is a risk of atrocity propaganda.

Okay, can you cite your new claims?

Rape happens all the time in war, but you’re claiming it is happening in a particular instance so I’m gonna need you to cite that or edit the comment.

Hey, please cite a reputable source for this or remove it.

I recognize some of these, do you have any proof they are AI generated? If not please edit your comment or delete it.

Hey, just as a heads up, “authoritarian” as a word is part of horseshoe theory and we don’t take kindly to that here.

Also saying someone is “just as reprehensible” as a fascist seems pretty damn trivializing of how bad fascism is.

You’re new here but this is stuff you’ll catch a ban for moving forward

Cite the sexual abuse stuff from a reputable source, or edit your comment.

I find this quite disingenuous. No one said that they are only thinking about the presidency? I sure as hell am not. I do everything I can in my local area to have socialist and leftist candidates representing me.

Expand your political imagination, this isn’t enough if you want to fight fascism.

Lol worker’s parties don’t need bourgeois elections to win power. See, China, ussr, Cuba