Militaries do that when attacked.

The purpose of a ceasefire isn’t one-sided martial domination, it is the acceptance of mutual intolerable (military) resource overexploitation.

At the moment, the Russian strategy doesn’t line up with the Ukrainian strategy for what a intolerable loss consists of.

might is right, repetition is truth

T-34 by german Punk band ‘Nachkriegsratten’ (After-war rats)

The german sausage screams for the end solution
Straight into the machine and full power
The german grunt is pissing his pants
T-34: What a tank!

T-34: WHAT A TANK!

From Hitler-boy to officer?
Who turns the light off? We!
A salute in the face - Goodbye Germany!
For everyday is the 8th May

T-34: WHAT A TANK!

Your torch marches have not yet extinguished
But since 1945 there's thrashing back
Stalingrad comes back! 1000 years snow
T-34: Potato puree

T-34: POTATO PUREE

owo

This looks even older…

… went kinda normal broke after his cult fell apart…

Are Germany and Italy and Japan former intervention therapy clients then?

And France is an aunt?

Nationalism’s weird.

Military people don’t steal, they ‘raid’.

Woah, you can include media in links?

[![Picture Description](Picture Link)](Link)

I agree, but that’s what a linux user would say…

Outsourcing industrial bases to overseas wasn’t so smart after all. The US can change that, but the EU isn’t as united, it’s a federation (talking 'bout you London) and seemingly quite slow. And invested (overseas).

I don’t code, but is hardcoding sudo EVER a reasonable thing in C?

Matrix for example would be better.

Removed by mod

Latent far right ideologies were the dominant background when the constitution came into existence. Yet, this is a situation (anti-democratic party with considerable power) that is not supposed to happen.

Maybe if they try to address the actual issues they wouldn’t have to fear far-right party which was marginal few years ago.

I think you know that one cannot engage by politics with Nazis to turn them. Far-right ideologies weren’t marginal, they simply had no platform, the backlash of 2015 (nine years ago) didn’t came out of nowhere.

The situation in the Middle East is sad, but it is not the “actual issue” in Germany at the moment.

• The AfD will not scrap their plans if the situation in the Middle East improves.
• Racist, far-right voters will not stop being racist, far-right voters if the situation in the Middle East improves.
• Racist, far-right media will not stop being racist, far-right media if the situation in the Middle East improves.

Planning the deportation of millions of people based on racism from Germany is more relevant to German politics and this discussion at the moment than the politics of the Middle East that may or may not resemble this.

This might have some truth to it, but you’re derailing.

Education is potentially a worse band-aid than anti-democratic party banning, because education requires skilled, paid and motivated workers that aren’t corrupted themselves. Party banning requires observing collective political organisations while education requires observing individual working persons.

“[…] and its almost exclusively a phenomena specific to the left…”

What about the KPD 1956 or the German Autumn then? This party and movement also represented

“a portion of the population”

that was excluded from polls or ‘participation’.

The paradox of tolerance, the historical fragility of each rule of law, the separation of powers and the constitutional state ( ‘Rechtstaat’ ) render parties and movements whose alignment aim for the qualitative destruction of these markers of political entities built to survive more than one election as not just risks, but dangers to regional democracy.