1·
2 months agoThere’s a multi-part talk on YouTube if you want to hear all about it.
- 0 Posts
- 15 Comments
Joined 5 months ago
Cake day: May 19th, 2024
You are not logged in. If you use a Fediverse account that is able to follow users, you can follow this user.
204·3 months agoYes, it was incredibly short sighted of the neoliberal “free market” Capitalist agenda to conduct their “race to the bottom” by sending vital manufacturing overseas.
That combined with privatisation and globalisation (and lots of unchecked corporate espionage done by China) has
given awaysold every single technological advantage the western world had been developing since the Industrial Revolution.
So you’re arguing that misinformation is fair if a campaign has done anything that can be remotely described as damaging (and you refuse to say what they did that was so damaging).
How could Russia harm them by leaking details of things that are not illegal and therefore (purportedly) entirely acceptable?
By including disinformation? It’s a pretty basic concepts, by lying.
From the Guccifer 2.0 Wikipedia page:
Some of the documents “Guccifer 2.0” released to the media appear to be forgeries cobbled together from public information and previous hacks, which had been mixed with disinformation.[9][10][11]
https://en.m.wikipedia.org/wiki/Guccifer_2.0
I’m not sure why so many people are reacting like this to my comments. The Republican Senate Committee was able to accept there was a Russian disinfo campaign, not sure why Lemmy thinks that’s all fine and dandy.
What DNC corruption exactly are you referring to?
The corruption of the electronic was done by Russia and the RNC accepting and not reporting foreign election interference. As per:
From the Guccifer 2.0 Wikipedia page:
Some of the documents “Guccifer 2.0” released to the media appear to be forgeries cobbled together from public information and previous hacks, which had been mixed with disinformation.[9][10][11]
From the Guccifer 2.0 Wikipedia page:
Some of the documents “Guccifer 2.0” released to the media appear to be forgeries cobbled together from public information and previous hacks, which had been mixed with disinformation.[9][10][11]
https://en.m.wikipedia.org/wiki/Guccifer_2.0
Could you show what specifically was fake?
I’m not an intelligence agent, so no, I can’t tell you what was and wasn’t faked. You would have to look into the various reports and intelligence findings yourself for that info.
From the Guccifer 2.0 Wikipedia page:
Some of the documents “Guccifer 2.0” released to the media appear to be forgeries cobbled together from public information and previous hacks, which had been mixed with disinformation.[9][10][11]
https://en.m.wikipedia.org/wiki/Guccifer_2.0
I never said anything about the technical details. I said the majority of the content was made up from information already released.
But yeah sure buddy, I’m sure the Senate Intelligence Committee got it wrong /s
Maybe do basic research before you go after someone for something they didn’t discuss. That way you won’t be left looking like an idiot.
There was Russian interference whether you want to believe it or not. I’ll let you go back to your qanon discussion group now.
The charges against Assange were made in 2012.
deleted by creator
“had the DNC simply been operating in a legitimate…”
Sorry, are you under the impression that the DNC has to choose a particular candidate? They don’t. That stuff is internal party politics. There’s no US law governing who they choose. That’s how party politics works.
Seeing as it was just patched together from other releases with Russian disinfo laced in between - it should have been removed a long time ago. Look up who submitted it to Wikileaks: Guccifer 2.0… who turned out to be a Russian agent (aka Fancy Bear).
Go look at Guccifer 2.0’s Wikipedia page, or the US intelligence senate hearing that confirmed Russian interference in the 2016 election. All this info is put there.
Assange thought it was win favor with Trump and maybe get him a pardon. Went as far as to continue to attribute the “leak” to staffer Seth Rich, even after Rich’s death in a botched burgulary.
Ghislaine’s father had several leaders and ex-leaders of Mossad at his funeral, and the Prime Minister of Israel gave the eulogy.
Definately stuff going on.
393·4 months agoOr just attack Russia regardless of them claiming you’re not allowed to?
America isn’t pushing the button, they’re just doing the usual thing of selling weapons.
It’s Russia’s fault they’re in this thing. They went full border war using their own citizens - when under Pax Americana you’re only supposed to do proxy wars in places not near you.
Russia has been doing that in Africa, their mistake has been doing it with their own guys on their own border.
Why are they called “Technicals” is it short for anything?
Edit: yep, “non-standard tactical vehicle” (NSTV) in US millitary terms… Weird that that term doesn’t have the word “technical” in it though.
International Criminal Court specialising in identifying such crimes vs the accomplice of the accused…
…hmmm, who is more qualified and less biased I wonder?
Swords really ruined stone spear heads, sharpened sticks, and clubbing people to death.