And that’s probably the figures China allows the international community to know. If the reports on that are anything like their emissions reports, it’s not even worth the time it took to generate them.

None of which align with each other, hence my continued statement of reading from many sources, of varied bias and neutrality. At least I know who is running the show in these places, unlike the unknown outlets you dredge up from the backwaters of the Internet.

You seem to have a serious comprehension problem. Best of luck on your continued education.

Well established? Then why is it relatively unknown? It’s barely searchable on any media bias metric, which is a bad start for it’s overall out reach and popularity.

USA Today? Please. I’m talking about worldwide outlets of varying neutrality and bias. Reuters, Al Jazeera, Sky, BBC, and AP to name a few.

Check those out if you get tired of the echo chambers I’d expect to find in social media ads and poorly worded tweets. You’re one step up from YouTube Shorts “news”.

There’s the deflection. Classic.

I read several worldwide publications of varying neutrality and bias to piece together a comprehensive understanding of issues.

You continue to post publications I’ve never heard of and of varying leftist bias. I look them up each time. You should heed your own advice and try broadening your news beyond obscure outlets. If they source a well known outlet that backs up the claim, linking to them would offer you better credibility. Unfortunately that’s not typical from my experience, reading these Facebook quality reports.

Justifying biased reading as “They haven’t sold out” is akin to burying your head in the sand.

It’s funny how that’s always the response. Obviously it has nothing to do with the well known bastion of free thought journalism at checks notes Black Agenda Report. How dare I question their credibility when they’re so well known… Lol

Lemmy, introducing you to the weirdest sources of biased “information”.

We also didn’t threaten to kill the farmers for growing it. No shit the Taliban was successful. Comply or die. They’re the ones who were profiting from it anyway. Now that they’re in charge again, religion trumps financial needs.

Or the fact we literally have drone and camera footage of mass arrests. I’m not one to view Vice these days, but one of their reporters went there and saw some rather suggestive situations as well.

After Trump was so nice (dumb) enough to showcase just how clear US satellite photos are these days, one has to question why some here are so quick to cry in China’s defense. Especially after the very public take over of Hong Kong, you think an ethnic cleanse is out of the question?

I’m sure some pro-Chinese twit will come rushing in with some whataboutism or a crack on US history, as if that excuses things.