deleted by creator

You do not understand anything in my previous sentence, do you? You think it means meeting on a battlefield, don’t you?

I am sick of a world full of feckless pussies. I hope it nukes tomorrow.

OR…just become ungovernable. This is how civil wars are actually waged worldwide.

So your police will fire wildly at a crowd of civilians? You have already lost. You are under fascist rule. You will now have to arm yourselves to survive.

In all of these discussions the defense from the left is always “we are weak and pathetic”.

The opponent does not think this way.

Where does “dying in a hail of bullets” come into play?

So…vote harder?

All of the radical right wing violence leading to more radical right wing politicians and radical right wing division from society on a local level. Also, the radical right wing threats of violence against political opponents that gives us shitbags like MTG.

Because their revolution has worked great without any social structure.

What is the social structure that fuels radical fascism?

All revolts have risk. Everyone knows this. A revolutionary does not dwell in them.

Is that to imply that you would be willing to lead then?

Gosh I wonder how fascism keeps managing to take hold

As an angry mob flooding the police precinct; not as an annoyed mob with signs standing in a designated area after obtaining permits to stand in the designated area with signs.

Imagine what life could be like if the people actually faught back against fascism.

But they never, ever do.

What economic reality makes housing affordable when used as a corporate investment scheme? What percentage of framing or roofing is provided by foreign-held stock portfolio? I can see we’re gonna yell past each other as you refuse to recognize what the housing shortage actually is. I lived in a country that built houses just fine and met the demand just fine until Reagan deregulated finance and manufacturing. Your concepts will find no purchase here, as they are a proven failure.

No it isnt. That makes no sense, and housing shouldnt be an investment scheme anyway. Their values cannot rise indefinitely. That’s the root of our housing problem right now.

Yes. There have been rent controls and outside investor restrictions. Lots of restrictions were lifted after the 2008 crisis, turning the housing industry iver to banks and private equity firms. And while you might be prone to saying that zoning restrictions caused urban sprawl, it should be noted that developers and real estate corporations wrote those laws and not a government serving the people. Today I learned from my Canadian friends that foreign investors are not allowed to buy Canadian properties. Meanwhile US is selling to anyone with the money no matter where they’re from.

By giving corporations and foreign investors the ability to buy up all they want, create scarcity, and tyrn the country into a high rent environment…you know, LIKE HAS ALREADY HAPPENED

Which is why all incentives for empty buildings should be eliminated. And if you move, convert or remove the old building instead of leaving an abandoned eyesore

All problems created by deregulation