I’m convinced Israel could whip out the nukes and Biden would still find a way to defend it.

Terror-aid is not to be confused with Kool-aid!

I think they call that projection

The mere existence of the things I linked you is pretty overwhelming evidence. Feel free to refute it at your leisure.

And I explained to you that these models aren’t incapable of learning, they’re given artificial restrictions not to in order to prevent what I linked from happening. They don’t learn to preserve the initial experience but are the exact same kind of AI. Generative.

About which part? The part that they can remember and expand their training data to new interactions but often become corrupted by them so much so that the original intent behind the AI is irreversibly altered? That’s been around for about a decade. How about the fact they’re “not faking it” because the added capacity to compute and generate the new content has to have sophisticated plans just to continue running in a timely manner?

I’d love to know which part you took issue with but you seemingly took my advice to shut the fuck up and I do profoundly appreciate it.

… No. They’re instanced so that when a new person interacts with them, they don’t have the memories of interacting with the person before them. A clean slate, using only the training data in the form the developers want it to. It’s still AI, it’s just not your girlfriend. The fact you don’t realize that they do and can learn after their training data proves people just hate what they don’t understand. I get it, most people don’t even know the difference between a neural network and AI because who has the time for that? But if you just sit here and go “nuh uh they’re faking it” rather than push people and yourself to learn more, I invite you, cordially, to shut the fuck up.

Dipshits giving their opinions as fact is a scourge with no cure.

The corporate dystopia is coming don’t worry.

Then I guess I skip past the trash because it actually gives me things I want. Like some dude cosplaying in fallout gear and acting out scenarios in a funny way. It feels like what Vine used to be, so it’s chill to me. TikTok just has too much jailbait and room temperature IQ posts of ‘stimulating’ videos. Like cutting kinetic sand or some shit.

Yeah, wasn’t bad for me. Don’t know what shit you guys get but I get stuff that isn’t brainless sigma videos or 14 year olds dancing in thongs.

Lol YouTube Shorts is fine, TikTok is oversatured dogshit.

Get fucked, stay fucked. YouTube shorts eating good.

See, I only have patience for one kind of stupidity and it’s ignorance. Those who simply haven’t learned and are trying to. They didn’t ask a question though, didn’t inquire for more information, made no attempt to acknowledge the importance of the assembly they claim needs to be disbanded. They made a confidently moronic statement and should be ridiculed as such.

You’re allowed to believe something that’s wrong but the moment you take that belief, turn it into confidence, and then preach that to others as if you knew better - off to the stockade, ready the tomatoes. We have at our disposal countless ways to educate oneself, forums for asking questions, The Library of Alexandria multiplied infinitely at our fingertips. To not use it at the mere prospect of doubt is an insult to everyone who has made such a thing possible.

Politics are hard, they’re messy, they’re really dumb, but they’re important and even when nothing gets done, something does. The UN is a critical pillar of world cohesion even if we haven’t gotten there yet. To dismantle it would be akin to taking a jackhammer to the foundation of a half built home. It should be easy to understand that by anyone paying attention.

Yes. Let’s disband the only gathering of all the nations in a peaceful assembly because politics can get hard sometimes.

The majority contributor to the UN. In both aid and military. This used to be a good thing when we didn’t vote for dogshit or vote against the entire counsel.

Right. So sugar isn’t the issue in feeding honey to babies. Baby food has sugar in it too. Just real interesting is all.

Because of the sugar or?

Yes, it is. Habitual addiction is addiction. While you might not suffer from it, just like some people can become alcoholics but not all, some people can become severely dependant on the way weed makes them feel.

If it can make you feel good, it can become addictive. Knowing the difference between habitual and chemical addiction is extremely important.

Fucking anything that derives pleasure can be habitually addictive, this shit means nothing. Literally nothing. Chemical dependancies are not the same fucking thing. Stop pretending they are so you can look smart. This circlejerk of dipshits is truly beyond my patience.

Lol the only reason you’re against this move is because sugar is vaguely tied to addiction and you want to demonize a corporation. Honey has sugar, are the bees trying to get us addicted too? These are the ramblings of the insane.

Yes, Nestlé fucking sucks. Evil, even. But them farting in the wind is not them engaging in chemical warfare. Treating it like it is, is part of what I can’t fucking stand. This is an isolated event. Just because someone has a shit reputation doesn’t mean every single minor move is a nefarious conspiracy.

You people are bored and hypocritical. The same people that would consider weed harmless but unironically compare sugar to cocaine. Sugar spurs on habitual addiction, not chemical dependancy. Not knowing the difference, pretending you understand addiction because you read the headline of a study and the parroted news articles, that’s how bullshit gets spread around.