I don’t know if my reading comprehension is poor or the Independent managed to write everything but what Scholz said (in both this article and the self-referenced article within)…

Can someone please clarify? What intelligence did Scholz apparently breach?

Surprised this was made public so soon to be honest.

It seems like the ethnic cleansing of the Palestinians was the only goal, the whole time.

The trouble you guys face is Trump is worse.

Just on Israel-Palestine alone, Trump is the person that recognised Jerusalem as Israel’s capital city. If that isn’t informative about his attitude about the situation…

LBC is generally just shit rage-bait and controversy farming.

They don’t do journalism.

It’s the Torygraph, you’re not missing much.

I found one source! It was sponsored by the British Tobacco Company, lol.

Nah, it’s difficult to find recent data of it - because I get the impression from the papers I have found - the idea was thrown out as a marketing ploy in the 50s and has no significant impact on risk.

Instead it just makes cigarettes worse for the environment - because the filters don’t decompose.

Yes, but then it’s a bit hypocritical if we don’t point out when something isn’t globally-relevant just because it’s Britain-relevant.

Very Britain-centric news; I wish c/worldnews were more specifically global relevant.

As for the article, it’s a shame it doesn’t address all of the 10 pledges and whether or not they’re being honoured in current Labour policy.

It also doesn’t do a very good job of analysing the pledges that it does include. Regarding income tax - is current Labour policy to not increase income tax on highest earners (or preferably, CGT/land value tax or something that more effectively targets the most wealthy)? The way the article quoted Reeves kind of felt a bit word twisty, but I’m not sure whether that was accidental or deliberate.

Riiigght.

Stupidity ≠ naivety.

You also failed to understand why it undermined the point, so my condolences for your critical thinking skills.

Considering I have no fucking idea what a NAFO troll is I feel like it undermines your point a fair bit. Maybe you keep hearing the same thing from others because you need to reconsider your position?

Do you guys get paid to shill for the Russian position? Or are you sad enough to do it for free?

Oh well I guess that makes it okay then.