![](/static/253f0d9b/assets/icons/icon-96x96.png)
![](https://lemmy.ml/pictrs/image/gWmVEUZ94Z.png)
Wikipedia too, I suppose.
This sub’s credibility seems to be on par with the Gray Zone based on what you’re upvoting - I’m blocking this brain rot.
Wikipedia too, I suppose.
This sub’s credibility seems to be on par with the Gray Zone based on what you’re upvoting - I’m blocking this brain rot.
Is this a case of “if you call us genocidal, we’ll kill you too”?
Unions aren’t silver bullets - but they’re bullets nonetheless, and that’s good enough most of the time.
Union contracts leave things less open to interpretation, union advice helps employees understand that this is a legal issue, and coordinated legal action and representation help you win the fight in court.
Leaving it to individual employees to individually see the problem, recognise they have legal standing, then fight Phoney Stark’s infestation of lawyers isn’t super-realistic, and turns the employment contracts into nothing more than a weapon to fuck with the employees, because Musk can just ignore anything in the contract favourable to employees.
You frame your statement as though the Israeli government’s disregard for the safety of Israelis is supposed to contradict the fact that they propped up a hostile terror org to kill their citizens and create a pretext for the genocide.
Why?
Seem clear to me that Israel did this for the same reason they helped Hamas oust more moderate PLO - backed groups - they wanted to manufacture the pretext for the genocide they’re now escalating.
It’s conservative to bend over and spread `em for the benefit of the owning class at the expense of everyone else - chiefly the workers those politicians claim to represent.
Others have pointed out the gaping differences in the health outcomes (including the burden that places on the healthcare system), addiction rates, etc.
How fucked up in the head do you need to be to make shit like that up?
About as fucked as any conservative regressive representative, pundit, or a good chunk of their voters.
Functionally, it’s not much different - a militarily dominant power invading with the backing of the bulk of the West, committing a genocide to sieze the territory.
In the case of Australia, it was arguably a bit worse than that - the legal “terra nullius” justification translates to “nobody’s land”. At best, it said that there was no civilisation here - in reality, the general consensus seems to have been closer to “they’re just animals”. The way they were treated did nothing to suggest otherwise.
I mean condemnation is a great start, but Israel isn’t going to stop killing Palestinians until they’re stopped, or there’s no Palestinians left to kill.
Their rhetoric has made it clear that killing civilians isn’t an unfortunate consequence of stopping Hamas - it’s the objective, and they propped up Hamas over the PLO to create the pretext for this.
I really don’t want to respond to this with whattaboutism and American diabolosm, but I’d be curious to this compared with the same rate in the US.
The world around, the rich just keep getting richer at the expense of the rest of us.
Removed by mod