![](https://lemmy.dbzer0.com/pictrs/image/01f1937c-014d-4201-9996-fe35b14ddca7.webp)
![](https://lemmy.ml/pictrs/image/gWmVEUZ94Z.png)
You do realize that someone can rape their spouse/partner right? The article does state that they were romantically involved for a year prior to the rape, so ex would be appropriate here.
Cybersecurity professional with an interest in networking, and beginning to delve into binary exploitation and reverse engineering.
You do realize that someone can rape their spouse/partner right? The article does state that they were romantically involved for a year prior to the rape, so ex would be appropriate here.
This model can fire large ordnance such as water heaters or oxygen cylinders weighing as much as 661 pounds.
bruh
Probably. The civil rights activist Che brought on last season was legit.
Put a public pgp key in your profile bio, then you can actually send true end to end encrypted messages over insecure public channels.
A very similar conversation led to a joke chain of pgp encrypted replies between me and some other rando on Reddit a few years ago. We were both banned.
deleted by creator
well played.
Huh. I guess the company i worked for was cheap as shit and bought trash cable.
Now I’m imagining a guy on top of a tank in battlefield conditions trying to do an emergency fuse repair on a fucked up pigtail while cleaning the glass with those fancy fiber wet wipes and ranting about how there’s too much dust.
The strands are still glass though, and have a much wider maximum bend radius than something like CAT* cable.
To be absolutely clear TOWs use copper wire.
I’ve read the same thing about the trails of wire all over the place in the Falklands also.
Also as someone who fired Javelins and TOWs in the Marine Corps, missiles are just fucking cool. I was always jealous of the SMAW guys tho bc they had a bigger kaboom on the firing side of things. Although that’s technically rocket I guess, but still cool.
Not in Bosnia in the 90s. US troops would take accurate inbound fire, have a clear visual on the shooter, and we’re not cleared to engage.
Sorry if I sounded harsh to you earlier. Hopefully one day in the future, neither of us will rent.
It’s all good, and thank you for your response. You really gave me a lot to chew on, I’ve never really considered a lot of what you brought up about bank owned mortgages, specially the bit about regulation and pre established wealth disparity.
deleted by creator
deleted by creator
deleted by creator
deleted by creator
Wtf? No I’m not defending anyone, are you serious? I’m just saying that the fucking newspaper headline is accurate and isn’t disparaging/insensitive to the victim in the situation.
Jesus fucking christ you are primed and ready to fucking go with your outrage. The article didn’t mention anything about the victim being a minor when they met, or about her being groomed. If that’s the case, yeah super fucked up, no shit. I literally opened the article after reading the post I responded to, read it, saw that it said the victim and Epstein were in a consensual relationship, then he raped her a year later.
If I’m missing context blame the article, not me dude.