cooljacob204

Something to consider is a monolith can have different entry points and a focused area of work. Like my web application monolith can also have email workers, and background job processers all with different container specs and scaling but share a code base.

And coming from a background where I work heavily with Postgres a bunch of smaller segregates databases sound like a nightmare data integerity wise. Although I’m sure it can be done cleanly there are big advantages with having all your tables in one database.

Imo if your doing it right your monolith is also broken up into chunks that are segmented with clear defined apis and well tested (apis in this context are whatever your public functions/method/top level objects). With clean internal apis and properly segmented code it should be easy to read and do what you need.

I don’t know if I agree with the infra level. What makes you say it has advantages there?

Biggest two advantages to micro services in my mind is you can use different tools / languages for different jobs and making it easier for multiple teams to work in parallel. Two biggest disadvantages in my mind is you lose code sharing and services become more siloded to different teams which can make it more difficult to roll out changes that need multiple services updated.

There is also the messaging problem with micro services. Message passing through the network rather then in memory. (Ex calling the user_service object vs user_service micro service)

One other big disadvantage of a monolith I also can think of is build time and developer tools can struggle with them. A lot more files/objects to keep track of and it can often make for an annoying development flow.

My preference is to monolith most things and only split off something into a micro service if you really get a big benefit from another tool or language for a specific task.

And in practice micro services become a fragile mess and takes longer to develop new products due to low code share and higher complexity.

Ofc not always the case, just like large monoliths can exist without being a mess.

Yeah maybe it isn’t considered to be yet. However it’s pretty rich to hear pro Russian people calling Ukraine fascists as Russia continues move towards fascism.

Big yikes. Russia is a facist, terror state and no amount of finger pointing and projection will change that.

You have literally 0 evidence for that claim. And to send weapons to Europe then back to Mexico would be a lot of work.

Much more likely its regular old US military corruption or weapon manufacturer corruption along with smuggling on the border.

And where are you from?

Ahh it finally comes out. You’re just a hateful individual. You’re so blinded by whatever hateful propaganda you have been eating up over the years you can’t even have a normal discussion on a topic with an American.

And more assumptions. I live in a big ass city :)

Ok you got a serious cass of brain rot. I guess this is what I get for replying to a .ml tanky. Calls me a Gringo to just dismiss everything I said. Real insightful.

No shit it’s not my call to make, I’m not a Mexican politician. However this is a English forum discussing the topic. Just because I’m an American doesn’t mean I shouldn’t be able to talk about a topic. In fact Cartels and America is pretty intertwined. As is Mexico and America. I also have family in Mexico. And so do a very, very large percentage of Americans.

Not really sure why you are so adamant on defending the Cartels. Unless your anti American fog is so bad that you can’t see past the fact I’m American.

You make it sound like I’m a dictator forcing people into a war.

I’m just being pragmatic. They have a large military tasked with protecting their citizens. Some of the Cartels are very much arguably terrorist organization. Indiscriminately murder and torture people in a very public way in order to scare others.

Fighting them would probably be painful at first but it would make the country a safer place in the end.

I’m aware. And I think that’s a US cultural thing not neoliberal. Most of Europe wouldn’t contribute to the weapon issue if they were next to Mexico.

But on the main topic, sure there is some crazy footage but he still is using a padded stick.

I don’t believe that. Other Central and South American countries have had success meeting the cartels head on.

Sure some short term death spikes but the long term result is a drastic reduction in violent deaths.

How many bus full of Mexicans must get slaughtered before he will fight them on behalf of Mexicans?

They have no problem abusing the same “loophole” for their plants in Europe and Asia.

They can tap all they want. His post is saying that due to encryption it doesn’t matter.

I just hope they feed the gps coords of Russians using it to Ukraine.

Async Rust sucks. I hate how many libraries use it, forcing it apon you.

And they are correct. I really wish Congress would get their shit together.

And I’m not trying to argue that they didn’t. I do believe Russia paid the biggest price and contributed the most. Especially in regard to the lives given to defeat the Axis. And I don’t really want to down play that.

But op is using WW2 to attack the US which is dumb. They also paid a large price in the war on both fronts, contributed a ton to allies through lend lease / material goods and were on the correct side of history in this instance.

Not to mention post WW2 was the one time we got nation building done correctly.

That has nothing to do with the post I replied to and I even agree with western historians / hollywood greatly downplaying the eastern front.

It’s been a very common thing recently with Russian to claim the West basically did nothing in WW2.

They are quite literally rewriting history in their classrooms.

Now I won’t deny they took the brunt of the force and paid an absolutely huge price in lives.

But op is trying to use WW2 as a way to say the US is bad. That we did nothing and only joined when it was basically over. It’s a super common Russian nationalist talking point right now.

Japan was not closer to conditionally surrendering to the USSR instead of the US. Even if they were that doesn’t magically make their war with the US end.

The reason for the bombs being dropped is very clear and you’re free to read countless books, articles, papers on it.

The Cold War started even before WWII ended.

Yes but not every choice during WW2 was about countering communism. We supplied them with an absolute ton of weapons and cutting edge vehicles, planes during the war. The threat of the axis/fascism far outweighed the threat of communism spreading at the time.