That doesn’t make sense.
You’re just repeating yourself without answering the question.
Nah brah. I’m not subscribed to this community, and yet sometimes its contents pop up in my feed. And I don’t want to sit through some video to learn about the content of the post.
So I appreciate when someone saves me a click.
I wasn’t going for an ethymological argument. Plenty of examples of words whose meaning veered away from its ethymology.
But the recent popularization of literally as a synonym of figuratively, well, it literally rustles my jimmies.
Interesting! Today I learned, then. Thanks.
Now, and this I’m going to say in a sort-of tongue-in-cheek manner, what’s your opinion on the recent change of the meaning of “literally”? Because that one is definitely less (ha!) than 200 years old.
I would normally agree with you.
But just as it’s okay for people to speak the way they want, it’s also okay for people to spread language knowledge. Then let the people decide whether they want to use that knowledge or not.
It’s not like OP said “it’s ‘fewer’, you idiot!” In that case, I’d say it’s elitism. Otherwise, it’s just a useful lemmy comment.
It means that the video may have an embedded ad about a wallet (I’m guessing a crypto wallet), which says “it’s important to select the right wallet.”
Another reason why AI is not there yet. Funny!
Oh hehe that’s so funny!! Good catch!
Tl;dw: summarized by AI:
The YouTube video “Tech Bros Invented Trains And It Broke Me” critiques Polish startup Nomo’s mrail train system, which aims to achieve speeds of 550 km per hour on conventional tracks. The speaker argues that this is unrealistic, as rail systems are divided into three segments based on speed. The speaker also criticizes the idea of automating trains, stating that selecting the right wallet is a more pressing concern. The video also discusses the challenges of implementing the European Rail Traffic Management System (ERTMS) in Europe due to the complex and disparate rail systems. The speaker compares European rail systems to American rail, highlighting issues with punctuality and mixed traffic. The video concludes that the Magrail system, which aims to transport containers at high speeds on land, is unnecessary and impractical due to logistical challenges and safety concerns.
Oh, I understand now. You were trying to be helpful, not critical.
Why?
If someone posts a video of funny cats, shouldn’t they post it in a cats community instead, per your logic?
Where’s that bot that summarizes videos?
Apology not accepted.
Bro, it’s quite a delight!
😂😂 Lol fantastic!
What’s an example of this?
Edit: I just saw the video’s description and the related content section.
Hm. Kinda weird.