True but the cow is also used for things like beef once slaughtered. A nut on the other hand is simply used up after being harvested.

A lot of the cow water figures get complicated quickly as well since various calculations either include or ignore indirect water usage. Things like water usage for their feed. Or whether the water usage is counting across an entire cows average lifespan, including slaughter and all byproducts, or just the water usage while the cow is producing milk.

This makes it hard to directly compare to something more simple like growing a nut or oats where the end product is essentially singular. There are a lot of variables to consider when trying to compare to a product from a farmed animal.

Almond milk I think was the better alternative.

Almond milk also requires 6x as much water to produce than oat milk. Almonds in general are a very high water usage crop.

Ryanair CEO Michael O’Leary said that Boeing showed a “lack of attention to detail.”

You know… Ryanair throwing shade around about lack of anything is pretty hilarious.

I think the difference is the intent of who will use the program.

Is the intended user the developer themselves and that’s about it but they’re making it available for others? Then just having the code is fine. It should still be properly documented however. Devs forgot their own shit code all the time, the documentation is there for them as well when they forget or come back to a project years later.

However if the program is intended for use by people outside the developers, then a regularly updated compiled binary should be expected. They are likely already going to be compiling it for themselves, making that process produce an updated binary release in GitHub isn’t too much to ask for something intended for others to use that the dev is already likely making anyway.

It’s explained in the first paragraph of the article.

It’s a fraud case. Different kind of cheat. To cheat here would be synonymous with to defraud.

All of these complaints are nearly identical to the complaints about major labels prior to streaming. It’s almost like the core issue is still the same, but the scapegoat is changing.

Hamas has an entire humanitarian arm. It’s one of the main reasons they have as much power as they do.

Several countries actually differentiate the separate parts of Hamas as well, recognizing that the humanitarian aid section is separate from the portion that fights instead of lumping everything together as if everything is black and white.