This is a secondary account that sees the most usage. My first account is listed below. The main will have a list of all the accounts that I use.
Personal website:
Ever received a Slack or a teams message that’s just your name but no context as to what’s actually needed? Like they need to confirm you’re there but don’t want to reveal why they’re asking.
“John.”
Problem is whether or not I’m present has a lot to do with the question.
I’m pretty sure I’ve had this exact conversation. Took me a minute to understand what the point was.
IDS will catch that. You need a logical sled that does effectively nothing but isn’t actually composed of NOPs.
How totally unexpected.
Worse sacrifices have been made in the face of a deadline.
This should be illegal. The fact that they are presently getting away with this speaks to the failures of our legal system.
I paid for the device to do these things. Would it be legal if you changed the rules to say that now all my property is yours for example or you’re taking away the device you sold me? It seems brazenly illegal.
It’s really messed up that they can force me to agree to new terms or discard my devices.
Yes. It’s a surprisingly bad debugger the more you think about it. I use it largely in assembly and it loves to spit out random errors about memory it tried to access based on the current register state. The shortcuts are kind of dumb.
It certainly works but I wouldn’t call it a pleasure to use.
Ex: try disp x/1i $eip often just doesn’t work.
Title made me wary that this could be antivax BS, but article is decent and writes that vaccines offer substantial benefits for nearly all recipients, though nothing in life is truly risk-free and naturally adverse events can rarely occur.
With that said, I would be very careful with this messaging because humans are bad at probability. The title seems unnecessarily ominous IMHO.
I don’t see anything new presented here. It’s been known for a long time that there are vanishingly small risks involved in vaccination.
You saved 96%, but the result still seems quite fluffy. Perhaps this kind of article is more challenging to summarize.
I feel this, especially when I’m looking up technical information. I’ll specifically exclude keywords and they show up in the first result.
Half the time I feel the search engine doesn’t care what I’m looking for.
Thank you! I never knew about that site before.