![](/static/253f0d9b/assets/icons/icon-96x96.png)
![](https://lemmy.ml/pictrs/image/gWmVEUZ94Z.png)
167·
7 months agoWell that’s dumb. But rules are rules.
Well that’s dumb. But rules are rules.
Does a “no” vote by the US automatically veto it? Or did they have to take an additional action? If the vote alone didn’t veto it, that’s the perfect place to hedge your bets. Vote no, then don’t veto it. You can claim both sides then to appease everyone.
I was thinking less “spy” and more “fingermen” like in V for Vendetta but more secretive.
It was more meant that they couldn’t vote no then not veto. That being the case they should have at least abstained like the UK.