![](/static/253f0d9b/assets/icons/icon-96x96.png)
![](https://lemmy.ml/pictrs/image/gWmVEUZ94Z.png)
It’s not over 'til it actually sinks. If they can tow it back to port, it might be repairable instead of a total loss.
See also https://lemmy.world/u/p1mrx
It’s not over 'til it actually sinks. If they can tow it back to port, it might be repairable instead of a total loss.
I found them via IP address, so I don’t know anything about the company beyond that.
2a09:: 2a11:: and 2409:: are the shortest.
Data centers […] have traditionally relied on renewable sources like solar and wind
I don’t think that’s really true. The green/grey graphs in this article show how difficult that is: https://www.canarymedia.com/articles/clean-energy/google-and-others-have-committed-to-24-7-carbon-free-energy-what-does-that-mean
Tuvalu only has 12,000 people. They could probably fit in the airport.
Net positive, like driving toward a cliff at a slightly slower speed.
Wait till you hear about the origins of Volkswagen.
This is only good news if it displaces thermal coal and gas generating stations.
Is there another plausible scenario? Wind and solar are getting so cheap, that displacing either with nuclear is like flushing money down the toilet.
Radiation levels have decreased since the accident in 2011:
https://upload.wikimedia.org/wikipedia/commons/0/06/Fukushima_radiation_dose_map_2011-04-29.png
Note that on Safecast, you can enable “Crosshair” in the hamburger menu to see the actual numbers.
The central blob area is currently around 5 μSv/hr, so if you live there for a year it’s 44000 μSv, or 44 mSv. The xkcd chart says 100 mSv is the lowest one-year dose clearly linked to increased cancer risk.
Then it would be a total loss. Nothing’s out there.