![](/static/253f0d9b/assets/icons/icon-96x96.png)
![](https://sh.itjust.works/pictrs/image/bae905b8-0357-4d8f-aeee-8c3227e76c8c.png)
Goddamn I was thinking of the same song!
Goddamn I was thinking of the same song!
“.eml is a format for e-machine learning”
It is similar in that there’s a pool of resource shared between all the clients, and the service provider can shift this resource around when in need.
Nvmd, a car killed it.
Now, the fact anyone would be in a LinkedIn community (aside from work related) is beyond me…
Don’t worry, just need to get outside of their bubble.
How did you fire your employer?
technical debt is your friend.
The whole state is a rogue actor.
There seems to be a more robust solution already. It’s called Public Domain.
Creative Common license are well accepted. It requires attribution for derivative works. Due to its clear legal wording, you can enforce it.
Why I want to be able to sue? Exactly so that people won’t take others’ freedom, just like why the law exist in free world. Haven’t you read about the many cases companies violating GPL got sued?
Then I’d have to ask: what is the benefit of choosing it over CC0 if by law, there won’t be any enforcement (not even attribution)? At least CC0 is well known.
Jokes aside, I wonder if any of the license mentioned in this thread is enforceable at all. Otherwise, might as well have CC0/PD
Jesus Christ. That’s how you go through life, isn’t it?
deadass vibin
Isn’t that the whole point?