WAR… is… disco?

Next your gonna tell me the raving rabbits are the ones driving them.

Ive seen people link that one multiple times and i am at a loss what its about.

The cc 4.0 license it points to does not mention AI at all.

CC even has a page where they state that it probably is legal to train on cc protected content but it depends on context.

https://creativecommons.org/2023/08/18/understanding-cc-licenses-and-generative-ai/

I think someone used ai to mean attribution/alike, international. Which are part of the full name (Attribution-NonCommercial-ShareAlike 4.0 International) but still make little sense as an acronym next to CC BY-NC-SA 4.0 being the official acronym.

This was my first thought but the way he instantly reacted with a i gotta call police after taking a first proper look at it makes me give benefit of doubt.

I now think the grab might have been more of a customer is ripping part of our equipment reflex. And then it dawned what he was actually dealing with.

Animal migration? Which if you think about it makes a lot of sense for a evolutionary explanation for this behavior.

The existence of night rhythm people is hypotized to be a genetic factor that a human group needs some people to guard at night to keep the fire going and everyone safe.

Having a person within your group capable of noticing and tracking patterns trough time in nature can be a huge benefit but there is little further advantages to have more/multiple people tracking the same things.

Our genetics never considered that one day we function in a mega society where most people we interact with don’t even know our full name, let alone our divergent skills and personal (dis)advantages.

Yes

The link between cannabis and schizophrenia is also supper dubious at best.

Its for the most part based on statistics that a large number of people who go to the ER and are there diagnosed with psychosis have used cannabis.

Schizophrenia is a genetic condition characterized by frequent psychosis. And a significant number of this group experiments with cannabis before onset of schizophrenic symptoms, which often only arise in late puberty/ young-adult age.

There are theories that cannabis may trigger schizophrenia in people that have the genetic sensibility to it. Assuming it would otherwise have stayed dorment (for longer)

But 3 pieces of information are ignored.

First people diagnosed with schizophrenia that did not use cannabis before onset of symptoms share the exact same statistically tendency to start using cannabis later in life as the group that did before, leading to theories of self medication and there is proof of anti-psychotic properties of some cannabinoids.

20% of the general population smokes (nicotine), 80% of the schizophrenic population smokes, its such a well known fact that its a common movie trope. Yet not a single theory about how nicotine effects psychosis exist. Because remember only rare people with a genetic sensibility can develop psychosis and psychotic paranoia is a fear tactic

Psychosis and schizophrenia are not well understood in general, there part of the neurodivergent spectrum which is a modern idea in its scientific infancy, More and more we do understand that the main driver of psychosis (and every person can be pushed into experiencing a psychosis) is extreme levels stress.

I know some other things extreme is related with:

• addiction to substance abuse of any kind, every time you crave = stress

• the troubles a (young) person may have that leads to them frequently using drugs to begin with.

The statistics do make sense but relation simply isn’t causation and its shameful that politicians can just misinterpret science like this.

For everyone else tripping slightly over this command.

Normal == Perfect Being different/ having a disability is not abnormal.

I am neurodivergent, this may often make people exclude me from the “normal/neurotypical” group. But the term is misused here

But in the broader sense, the way the term is used above is not excluding in the same way.

You forgot the ads on google

Both google and Microsoft have **said ** that they will take full responsibility if there ai is found to breach copyright

Thats not the same as racism and harm, ai ending copyright is a huge fear for big-tech so of course thats the system they defend but it does set the door open for other responsibilities.

Best case their promise is made into law and expands on it.

If its against AI scrapping i am not sure what this will do to stop any of it. 1 dollar is a very low price to gain access to valuable data and many will gladly pay it for a bot. It only takes a single bot to open the profile of a list of users to then copy paste and store all that data elsewhere in a local document.

Neither will it stop scammer bots that are much more profitable then that cost.

The only kind of bot that would be stopped are the are fun hobby projects that don’t generate value.

I wonder if the real reason is an incentive not to erase your “free” account.

I highly doubt that X is getting new users besides people that left trying to go back.