• FlickOfTheBean@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      10
      arrow-down
      1
      ·
      8 months ago

      Tbh at this point I’m convinced articles like this are just life support trying to claw back as many Musk dick riders back into normies.

      It’s good work, and I think it should be done, but yeah, this is exactly what a sane person would expect to see given all the context.

      It’s not news to most, but to the audience that I think this sort of thing is going after, it genuinely might be news to them.

      Not that this article alone would get anyone to drop their fanboy bs, but it seems like it’s intended to be a tool to facilitate that. As for why it’s here specifically in world news, probably in case anyone wants to use it as a facilitation tool for anyone in their lives. Can’t use what you don’t know exists and all that lol

    • Omega_Haxors@lemmy.ml
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      7
      arrow-down
      4
      ·
      8 months ago

      Yeah pretty much, this isn’t accomplishing anything. Anyone who still can’t see the fascist empire for what it is at this point will never see it.

      • BolexForSoup@kbin.social
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        10
        arrow-down
        1
        ·
        edit-2
        8 months ago

        Elon Musk is still a mixed bag in the broader public. There is still a lot of messaging to get out there and that will help people realize what he is. Not everyone is as terminally online as we are lol

    • TheAnonymouseJoker@lemmy.ml
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      9
      arrow-down
      8
      ·
      8 months ago

      Elon utilises rightwing to create chaos and make bank off of it, not because he personally loves Hitler. It is good to keep distinctions separate. The problem stems from ultracapitalists and businessmen being sociopaths and even narcissists.

      • forrgott@lemm.ee
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        3
        arrow-down
        1
        ·
        8 months ago

        He is a right-wing nut job who creates chaos. Not the other way around. They flock to him because he is one of their own.

        • TheAnonymouseJoker@lemmy.ml
          link
          fedilink
          arrow-up
          9
          arrow-down
          7
          ·
          8 months ago

          A nut job that is a byproduct of seeking profit from rightwing appeal, NOT a rightwinger from the beginning itself. The nuance is critical to map out how these clowns are created in society, to establish a set of blueprints as examples for common knowledge.

          • forrgott@lemm.ee
            link
            fedilink
            arrow-up
            4
            ·
            8 months ago

            Nuh uh. He’s not a victim. He’s part of the problem, and always has been. Don’t make excuses for that sociopathic freak.

            • TheAnonymouseJoker@lemmy.ml
              link
              fedilink
              arrow-up
              9
              arrow-down
              7
              ·
              edit-2
              8 months ago

              He is not a victim. He chose to “capitalise” on rightwing audience appeal like a capitalist businessman. But there is nuance and its best understood instead of ending up having another circlejerk on how Musk bad, as we know sky is blue and water is wet. I was one of the first to find what a piece of shit he is, before the world considered it cool. I used to think of him back then and tell it as US government creating a “science poster boy” of USA, replacing Bill Gates in the media.

              • forrgott@lemm.ee
                link
                fedilink
                arrow-up
                4
                ·
                8 months ago

                Ok. As far as nuance, I still assert he is a cause, not an effect. His choice to capitalize on rightwing audience doesn’t mean he didn’t already hold those beliefs. I got the impression, perhaps mistakenly, that you were asserting that he adopted those beliefs because there’s a market for them; I would argue he adopted that audience because they share beliefs he already had.

                This would align him with many others who came from similar privilege. In fact, I’m more skeptical of those born in privilege who publicly denounce right wing ideology (although I absolutely do my best to judge by their actions when possible), given that concerning the status quo is obviously in their self interest.

                Our apparent disagreement may be, at least partially, due to semantics. Yet, the words we choose do matter. I appreciate the thoughtful debate in either case!

                • TheAnonymouseJoker@lemmy.ml
                  link
                  fedilink
                  arrow-up
                  10
                  arrow-down
                  6
                  ·
                  8 months ago

                  I like to have these kind of debates. Its only when thoughtful thinkers (not armchair bros and sisters) can discuss with good faith and nuance that a lot of problems can be resolved.