• BlameThePeacock@lemmy.ca
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    0
    ·
    9 months ago

    Who are we going to need to fight against right now that would require significant ammunition stocks?

    Clearly Russia can’t do jack shit to anyone else right now, they’re far too busy even just trying to hold the small chunk of Ukraine they invaded.

    Do we think China is going to take this opportunity to invade a NATO ally?

    • NaibofTabr@infosec.pub
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      0
      ·
      9 months ago

      Do we think China is going to take this opportunity to invade a NATO ally?

      Possibly Taiwan, especially if they think the US is overextended and unwilling to invest in another conflict.

      • OurToothbrush@lemmy.mlM
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        0
        arrow-down
        1
        ·
        9 months ago

        Why would they do that when they’re strategy of peaceful economic integration has been working so well?

        • Ooops@kbin.social
          link
          fedilink
          arrow-up
          0
          ·
          9 months ago

          Same reason Russia did it. The allmighty leader gets older and wants to see it happen before he dies as some stupid form of legacy.

          • OurToothbrush@lemmy.mlM
            link
            fedilink
            arrow-up
            0
            arrow-down
            1
            ·
            edit-2
            9 months ago

            Except China has a vibrant democracy with a 95 percent approval rating, Xi isn’t that old, and Russia is a nakedly corrupt bourgeois “democracy”, sure

            Or literally any historical analysis as opposed to marvel movie understandings of politics

            • zephyreks@lemmy.mlOPM
              link
              fedilink
              arrow-up
              0
              ·
              9 months ago

              “Approval ratings” are rather nebulous. By the divisive and partisan nature of American politics, approval ratings in America are naturally going to be low because both parties exist solely to shit on each other. In China, “approval ratings” get measured from the perspective of “is my life improving?” rather than “would my life be improving more under someone else?”

              Honestly? I think asking if someone’s life has improved is a more fair polling question to ask, but it’s one that’s difficult to differentiate in the US because of how radicalized everyone is.

              Basically, what I’m saying is that the US would have a higher effective approval rating in the Chinese context than it does today, because many American lives ARE improving under the American government. People just think (often incorrectly) that it would improve more if the other party had power.

              • OurToothbrush@lemmy.mlM
                link
                fedilink
                arrow-up
                0
                arrow-down
                1
                ·
                9 months ago

                In China, “approval ratings” get measured from the perspective of “is my life improving?” rather than “would my life be improving more under someone else?”

                Wow, an actual useful metric for whether the government is responsive to the populations needs.

                Basically, what I’m saying is that the US would have a higher effective approval rating in the Chinese context than it does today, because many American lives ARE improving under the American government.

                Except for life expectancy reductions, child malnutrition, literacy rate reductions, etc

    • freagle@lemmygrad.ml
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      0
      arrow-down
      3
      ·
      9 months ago

      It’s been less than a week and I’m here to let you know that this comment has aged poorly. The counter-offensive is over. Ukraine has made no significant progress, meanwhile Russia has gained ground.