![](/static/253f0d9b/assets/icons/icon-96x96.png)
![](https://lemmy.ml/pictrs/image/gWmVEUZ94Z.png)
… bit of the official line is that man’s son wasn’t making fried rice, then how can chef guy be disrespecting him?
… bit of the official line is that man’s son wasn’t making fried rice, then how can chef guy be disrespecting him?
This is blowing my mind a little bit.
This is a better article:
Maybe but it still serves a purpose.
Imagine what working there ATM would be like.
Yeah but it doesn’t seem like anything actually happened. Article says drivers “may” have sustained minor injuries.
China is a bully. Crying about every little thing to the media doesn’t feel like the right way to handle them.
Removed by mod
Removed by mod
It’s such a weird thing to say.
Also comments about recidivism. These assholes are anything but reformed.
The article is reporting on a court case, the public court record is the obvious source.
I think there’s also just good old poverty and hopelessness.
It seems like life is just getting harder for younger generations. No homes, shit jobs, fix the planet for us, etc etc.
Frustration and feelings of persecution breeds this kind of tribalism and manifests as some kind of hatred.
You must be new here.
Please attach some basic conditions like… don’t do war crimes.
I mean you’re right of course, buy even if they’d doubled the number… would 2500 deaths be ok?
The thing is… every one of these issues could be addressed if people didn’t vote against their own interests.
I think it’s just timing, the phrase arose around the time that it was becoming obvious that covid vaccines were perfectly safe, had no 5g chips, did not cause infertility, et cetera.
The various social groups that had coalesced around covid related conspiracies needed something new and un-disprovable to use as an outward manifestation of their internal feelings of persecution, so they just lapped it up.
Should I cut my nails this month? If only there was a list of 7 things I should consider.
I don’t think that this is really true.
If someone has “more” then yes of course someone needs to have “less”, merely by definition.
The question is really whether those with less are living below the poverty line or living comfortably. I guess it’s a question of semantics whether “capitalism” requires people to be living below the poverty line but I don’t think it does. It’s just shitty regulations which allow wealth to become as concentrated as it has.
Socialism in principle sounds great, but most times it’s been implemented it’s suffered from the same problem as capitalism - the people with power are greedy and use their power to manipulate and oppress the populace.
This sounds like hyperbole. Nuclear has been powering the world for decades. It may not have enjoyed sexy headlines, but it’s hard to believe billions of dollars has been invested in new plants without any research.
People were such dimwits about it though. Even if you had a security guard at the entrance to every shop challenging people to wear properly fitted n95s, I’m certain heaps of people would remove it after they walked past just on principle.
Wait, you mean when we genocide people they become radicalised and support whatever organisation with defend them? I’m shocked.