• zerfuffle@lemmy.ml
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    11
    ·
    9 months ago

    I have zero hope for the US to actually bite on EVs. The only reason China has seen such rapid adoption is that, even without incentives and subsidies, EVs are cheaper than ICE vehicles. That’s simply not true in the US yet and won’t be true for at least another few years.

  • SUPAVILLAIN@lemmygrad.ml
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    4
    ·
    9 months ago

    As much as the nations shifting to renewables will offset, America will still crank out enough coal, oil, and natural gas to charbroil the planet by 2050 anyway.

  • AutoTL;DR@lemmings.worldB
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    2
    ·
    9 months ago

    This is the best summary I could come up with:


    In its annual World Energy Outlook released on Tuesday, the IEA said peaks in oil, natural gas and coal demand were visible this decade in its scenario based on governments’ current policies - the first time this has happened.

    Still, the IEA also said as things stand, demand for fossil fuels is set to remain far too high to keep within reach the Paris Agreement goal of limiting the rise in average global temperatures to 1.5 degrees Celsius.

    “This risks not only worsening climate impacts after a year of record-breaking heat, but also undermining the security of the energy system, which was built for a cooler world with less extreme weather events,” the agency said in a statement.

    By 2030, the IEA expects there to be almost 10 times as many electric cars on the road worldwide, and it cited policies supporting clean energy in key markets as weighing on future fossil fuel demand.

    For example, the IEA now expects 50% of new U.S. car registrations will be electric in 2030, up from 12% in its outlook two years ago, largely as a result of the U.S. Inflation Reduction Act.

    An OPEC report earlier this month said calls to stop investments in new oil projects were “misguided” and “could lead to energy and economic chaos.”


    The original article contains 481 words, the summary contains 215 words. Saved 55%. I’m a bot and I’m open source!