Let’s highlight the actual points in this article instead of taking Hexbear at their word:
emphasizing that violent protest is not protected under the law.
Biden emphasized that “peaceful protest is in the best tradition of how Americans respond to consequential issues”
“Whether it’s antisemitism, Islamophobia or discrimination against Arab Americans or Palestinian Americans, it’s simply wrong… In America, we respect the right and protect the rights for them to express that, but it doesn’t mean anything goes. It needs to be done without violence, without distraction, without hating and within the law.”
The president also said “no” to a separate shouted question asking whether he thinks the National Guard should intervene in the campus protests.
To summarize, he respects their right to protest and called for nonviolence without citing any side in particular. Notable that there have been violent counter-protestors.
Mental illness is a hell of a drug
I love how “libertarians” have turned into religious nationalists
Removed by mod
Have a couple sources that explain how you’re wrong:
https://www.globaldata.com/data-insights/macroeconomic/the-unemployment-rate-of-china-220098/
Unemployment data always excluded students and everyone else outside of job seekers?
Edit: OP is lying, don’t believe unsourced stuff you read on Lemmy
Or they’re just bitter
I cited a pro-Ayatollah news source that gave a more complete version of this story lol. This site is so bad it’s not even good enough to match state-run propaganda outlets.
If you really think they give a shit about women’s rights, maybe you’re the one who needs to mix up your media diet a bit. I’m amazed that there are people who don’t believe that a fascist is anything other than a fascist, but ig people are still out here supporting Trump too
Edit: anyone wanna bet whether this guy is a Tiennamen square denier? I’m sure he read it in one of his news outlets
So you’re a fan of right wing shills? Not sure what you’re trying to say
Something reputable? Something that doesn’t fixate on making dictators look good without covering the full story of his comments?
No, because they’re publishing a story that nobody else is that’s weirdly pro-Ayatollah
Good, then it should be done by a legitimate source, not a spam one that is known for not citing sources.
Looked like a weird website and turns out it is pretty sketchy
Edit: https://www.tehrantimes.com/news/493018/Door-open-for-women-s-political-social-activities-in-Islam
There’s another article about how he still treats women poorly, based on comments earlier this week. And it’s even pro-Ayotollah, but still clear how bad he is
Sexual violence as a tool of war has always happened and probably will always happen as long as wars exist. Pick a war, pick any side, they use sexual violence.
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC2631054/
I’m not defending anyone doing this, I think it’s heinous, but it’s incredibly common, which is my main point.
If the title doesn’t automatically generate, you need to type it in